Temporal vs Inngest: the honest comparison
The short answer
Edition v2026.Q3 · pricing and status verified 2026-08-06.
Choose Temporal for production agent fleets and money-touching workflows that must survive crashes, redeploys, and week-long human-in-the-loop pauses. Choose Inngest for typeScript/serverless product teams who want durable step functions, events, and per-tenant flow control (debounce, throttle, concurrency) with zero infrastructure.
On the elems table, Temporal holds seat #1 of the Orchestration element and Inngest holds #2 — this is the closest call in the category, and the honest answer depends on which trade-off you can live with.
The case for each
1TemporalTemporal Technologies
Self-host free (MIT) · Cloud: Essentials from $100/mo (1M actions) · Business from $500/mo · Enterprise custom · $1,000 trial creditsBest for Production agent fleets and money-touching workflows that must survive crashes, redeploys, and week-long human-in-the-loop pauses.
Watch The steepest learning curve in the category — deterministic-workflow constraints, workers, task queues — and self-hosting the server is a real ops job. Per-action Cloud pricing gets chatty-agent expensive; every tool call and retry is an action.
2InngestInngest
Hobby free (50k executions/mo) · Pro from $99/mo (1M executions, 100 concurrency) · Enterprise customBest for TypeScript/serverless product teams who want durable step functions, events, and per-tenant flow control (debounce, throttle, concurrency) with zero infrastructure.
Watch The server is SSPL with delayed Apache-2.0 — practically, you're buying the cloud. Execution-count pricing punishes chatty agents, and the eval push moves it onto Ev-element turf it hasn't proven yet.
Temporal vs Inngest: side by side
Edition v2026.Q3 · verified 2026-08-06.
| Temporal | Inngest | |
|---|---|---|
| Execution model | Server + workers (you run code) | Event-driven steps on your compute |
| License | MIT server | SSPL server, Apache SDKs |
| SDK languages | Go · Java · TS · Py · .NET · PHP · Ruby | TS · Py · Go · Kotlin/Java |
| Cloud entry | $100/mo (1M actions) | $99/mo (1M execs) |
| Self-host | Yes (real ops job) | Dev server yes; prod = cloud |
| Agent tooling | OpenAI Agents SDK GA · AgentKit-style samples | AgentKit · Agent Evals · flow control |
| Proof at scale | OpenAI, Block; 9.1T actions | SoundCloud; Series A stage |
What each side won't tell you
Temporal: The steepest learning curve in the category — deterministic-workflow constraints, workers, task queues — and self-hosting the server is a real ops job. Per-action Cloud pricing gets chatty-agent expensive; every tool call and retry is an action.
Inngest: The server is SSPL with delayed Apache-2.0 — practically, you're buying the cloud. Execution-count pricing punishes chatty agents, and the eval push moves it onto Ev-element turf it hasn't proven yet.
If it's neither
The rest of the top five: Trigger.dev (typescript agents, managed compute) · Hatchet (postgres tasks, mit oss) · Restate (single-binary durable runtime). The complete field — 24 more tools including the graveyard — is on the element page.
This analysis is drawn from the Orchestration element dossier — the ranked top 5, the comparison matrix, and the complete field of 24 more tools live there, with every source. Data: or.json (CC BY 4.0).
Every claim above is dated and sourced from the elems dossiers — 1,421 tools tracked across 58 categories, verified 2026-08-06, including the 276 we found dead, renamed, acquired, or sunsetting. Rankings are editorial, never paid — the charter.
Build your stack in 5 questions →