Vapi vs Retell AI: the honest comparison
The short answer
Edition v2026.Q3 · pricing and status verified 2026-08-06.
Choose Vapi for developer teams who want full control of the voice stack — pick your own STT/LLM/TTS, test it, and ship a production support line as code. Choose Retell AI for ops-led teams who want production support agents this week — dashboard-built, transparent per-minute menu pricing, monitoring and QA included.
On the elems table, Vapi holds seat #1 of the Voice Support element and Retell AI holds #2 — this is the closest call in the category, and the honest answer depends on which trade-off you can live with.
The case for each
1VapiVapi (YC W21)
$0.05/min platform + models/voices at cost ($0 BYOK) · 10 concurrent lines incl., +$10/line/mo · HIPAA +$2k/mo, zero-retention +$1k/mo · enterprise volume-basedBest for Developer teams who want full control of the voice stack — pick your own STT/LLM/TTS, test it, and ship a production support line as code.
Watch Orchestration-only means you own the debugging across four vendors' models. Add-ons bite: HIPAA is $2,000/mo before a single call. Ops teams without engineers ship faster on Retell or no-code tools. Series B valuation undisclosed.
2Retell AIRetell AI (YC W24)
Pay-as-you-go $0.07–0.31/min all-in (infra $0.055 + TTS + LLM menu) · 20 concurrent incl. · $10 free credit · AI QA +$0.10/min · enterprise customBest for Ops-led teams who want production support agents this week — dashboard-built, transparent per-minute menu pricing, monitoring and QA included.
Watch A ~$5M war chest against $11B-and-up rivals is a real asymmetry if the category turns capital-intensive. Component pricing stacks: knowledge base, PII redaction, and QA add-ons push the effective rate toward the top of the range. ARR and call-volume figures are Sacra-sourced, not company-published.
Vapi vs Retell AI: side by side
Edition v2026.Q3 · verified 2026-08-06.
| Vapi | Retell AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $0.05/min + components at cost | $0.07–0.31/min all-in |
| Free tier | Trial credits | $10 credit |
| Builder | API-first + dashboard | Dashboard + API + Conductor |
| BYO model/voice | Yes — any STT/LLM/TTS | Yes — LLM menu per-min |
| Self-host / VPC | No (cloud) | Dedicated server (ent.) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 · HIPAA +$2k/mo · PCI | SOC 2 · HIPAA BAA |
| Proof point | 1B+ calls; Ring 100% inbound | $60M ARR; 40M calls/mo |
What each side won't tell you
Vapi: Orchestration-only means you own the debugging across four vendors' models. Add-ons bite: HIPAA is $2,000/mo before a single call. Ops teams without engineers ship faster on Retell or no-code tools. Series B valuation undisclosed.
Retell AI: A ~$5M war chest against $11B-and-up rivals is a real asymmetry if the category turns capital-intensive. Component pricing stacks: knowledge base, PII redaction, and QA add-ons push the effective rate toward the top of the range. ARR and call-volume figures are Sacra-sourced, not company-published.
If it's neither
The rest of the top five: ElevenLabs Agents (best voices, cheapest entry) · Sierra (voice) (pay-per-resolution enterprise) · Bland (flat-rate, self-hosted stack). The complete field — 16 more tools including the graveyard — is on the element page.
This analysis is drawn from the Voice Support element dossier — the ranked top 5, the comparison matrix, and the complete field of 16 more tools live there, with every source. Data: vs.json (CC BY 4.0).
Every claim above is dated and sourced from the elems dossiers — 1,421 tools tracked across 58 categories, verified 2026-08-06, including the 276 we found dead, renamed, acquired, or sunsetting. Rankings are editorial, never paid — the charter.
Build your stack in 5 questions →